SANTA CLARA, Calif. — A war of words of sorts emerged this week at the SPIE Advanced Lithography conference among vendors developing source mask optimization (SMO) tools in hopes of extending 193-nm immersion lithography to the 22-nm node.
Lithographers have for years used various schemes and computational techniques to optimize the illumination source. Likewise, they have long been optimizing the photomask through tricks like reticle enhancement techniques (RETs) and phase-shift approaches. SMO tools are being offered and developed which promise to optimize the source and mask in tandem in order to maximize image contrast in a scanner.
But some say the term is being used for marketing purposes by a number of companies hawking fundamentally different technologies. They liken the situation to that which occurred with DFM, a well-worn acronym that came to be used to promote any technology remotely aimed at design-for-manufacturing.
"DFM is a great analogy" for what is happening with SMO, said Timothy Farrell, a distinguished engineer in computational technology with IBM's systems and technology group.
A number of companies are either developing or offering for sale SMO tools, including IBM, Brion Technologies, Luminescent Technologies Inc., Nikon Corp. and Cadence Design Systems Inc.
But Farrell and an executive from Mentor Graphics Corp., which is working with IBM on SMO for computational scaling, say the work being done by other firms does not truly optimize the mask, instead focusing on optimization of the illumination source for use with a reticle incorporating standard optical proximity correction (OPC).
"Source optimization capability has been around a long time," said Charlie Albertalli, a marketing director at Mentor. "We are seeing people use the terminology source-mask optimization when what they are really doing is source optimization."
RSS
Digital
10 emerging technologies to watch:
EE Times has compiled a list of emerging technologies that we think will be worth watching out for in 2010. Biofeedback or thought-control of electronics are among the contenders.
10 CEOs out in 2009:
It's been a tough year for the global electronics industry and CEOs. We survey the dismissal of 10 industry CEOs during the first three quarters of 2009 and what's ahead for the rest of the year.
Executive pay:
The economy stinks. Rank-and-file engineers are feeling the pain. What about technology CEOs? We crunched the numbers buried in corporate financial statements to find out. Here's what we found.
10 companies in trouble (revisited):
What follows is an updated version of 10 companies in trouble. Some companies have been removed since the last version, others remain. Still others have been added to the mix.
Early predictions for 2010:
The electronics industry is recovering, but there is still some uncertainty in the market. Some see a boom year in 2010. Some see a double dip. So what's in store for the rest of this year and 2010?
Top 10 IC vendors with cash:
The world's biggest IC companies by revenue rank not only among the best in their respective industry segments but are also more likely to have huge piles of cash that can be used to fund acquisitions, R&D and product development.
Notable women in microelectronics:
There is no better time than a global economic recession to examine the keys to successful corporate governance. So, EE Times has compiled an international list that celebrates women who are business and technology leaders in semis.
EE Times updates Silicon 60:
Seventeen companies have been added to the lastest version of our Silicon 60 list of emerging startups. Forty-three companies survived as emerging companies that are still worth watching.
RSS| 
Digital| 
Mobile
