United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMELATEST NEWSSEMICONDUCTORSMOST POPULARMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSS

 


Feedback: 6 critical keys to IP licensing success
Print this article Email this article Reprints RSS Digital Edition

EE Times


Thanks for an excellent deep dig on the IP business with your report on MIPS-Chipidea (Analysis: Dissecting the MIPS-Chipidea breakup). However, several interesting facts related to the IP licensing market were omitted, all of which are critical to understanding the evolution of the industry segment and the key players in the sector. These factors include the following:

1. Digital soft core IP can by synthesized for any fab process technology, making one development effort applicable to hundreds of chip designs. Also, analog IP must be redesigned for every fab and every process, making each development applicable to just a small handful of chips at best.

This explains why, after Lexra sparked the soft core processor IP business in 1997and 1998, MIPS spun out from Silicon Graphics and ARM switched from exclusively licensing hard cores to also licensing soft cores and saw its customer base grow remarkably.

2. IP companies have a long latency from initial development to profitable royalty revenue.

3. Royalty revenue gives IP companies tremendous staying power and long-term stability (better than EDA, and much better than chip companies). Despite the colossal Chipidea bungle and even if MIPS never sold another license, which is unlikely, the company would exist for at least a decade just from latent royalty payments alone.

For example, Lexra sold its last IP license eight years ago and closed its doors seven years ago but it is still shipping in volumes as the main processor in at least three different chip companies' product lines.

4. While ARC indeed has high volume, it is predominantly from two deals, (SanDisk flash controller and Intel Wi-Fi acceleration in notebook chips) both negotiated with no long-term royalties. Tensilica is stronger than ARC in terms of current balance sheet and long term royalty revenue potential, though neither is quite in the same class as MIPS.

5. MIPS now lags ARM on key competitive trends shown by other processors such as 128-bit SIMD extensions (i.e. ARM Neon or PowerPC AltiVec), SoC interconnect automation (i.e. ARM AXI fabric or Sonics), and memory controllers (i.e. ARM or Denali controllers).

6. A less surprising acquisition for MIPS than Chipidea would have been Sonics or Denali. Even Imagination Technologies and MIPS would have been a more technologically synergistic tie-up.

Jonah Probell is a Sunnyvale, Calif., based design engineer and entrepreneur. He is founder and processor architect at Yap IP and previously worked for Lexra, ARC, and Tensilica. Probell can be reached at jonah@jonahproblell.com.



Related Links:

  • Analysis: Dissecting the MIPS-Chipidea breakup
  • Analog/digital marriage ends; MIPS/Chipidea not a good idea



  •   Free Subscription to EE Times
    First Name Last Name
    Company Name Title
    Email address
      Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
     
    CAREER CENTER
    Looking for a new job?
    SEARCH JOBS
    SPONSOR

    RECENT JOB POSTINGS
    CAREER NEWS
    SRC Expands R&D Centers
    The Semiconductor Research Corp has added a new center to its university R&D efforts.

    For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.



    All White Papers »   

     
    Education and
    Learning


    Learn Now:












    Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
    Network Websites
    International
    Network Features




    All materials on this site Copyright © 2009 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
    Privacy Statement | Terms of Service | About