News & Analysis
Intel, Micron seek to regain NAND process lead
Mark LaPedus
12/22/2009 11:16 PM EST
During a conference call on Tuesday (Dec. 22), Micron said that it will be ''shortly'' sampling a 2x-nm NAND device. It did not specify the exact node, but some expect the company will disclose more details in early 2010.
Micron and its NAND partner, Intel, are expected to ramp a 2x-nm NAND device in 2010. With the product, Intel and Micron could leapfrog Samsung and Toshiba. Intel and Micron are partners in a joint NAND venture dubbed IM Flash Technologies LLC.
Both Intel and Micron are also selling solid-state disk (SSD) products, based on NAND. Intel has made inroads in the SSD market, while Micron is struggling in the arena, analysts said.
Memory chip vendor Micron recorded its first profit in three years during the period ended Dec. 3, topping Wall Street's expectations with sales of $1.74 billion, the company said Tuesday (Dec. 22).
The company's NAND business grew 21 percent in the quarter, while DRAM jumped 50 percent in the period. In fact, Micron is on allocation for select products, reportedly including DDR3 SDRAMs.
And for some time, the Intel-Micron duo had the lead in the NAND process race. The companies have been shipping product based on a 34-nm process.
Then, in April, Japan's Toshiba Corp. grabbed the lead. The company has been accelerating the ramp of its NAND flash memory products, based on its long-awaited, 32-nm process technology.
In August, the 3-bit-per-cell (x3) NAND race began to heat up, as Intel and Micron officially announced their initial offering in the arena. The x3, multi-level cell (MLC) NAND technology is based on a 34-nm process.
Earlier this month, South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. said it has begun volume production of 3-bit, multi-level-cell (MLC) NAND flash chips using a 30-nm manufacturing process technology. The chips are a 4-Gbit array with 3-bits per memory cell providing a memory capacity of 32-Gbits.
Now, Intel and Micron have a 2x-nm device in the works. Still, Samsung remains the market share leader in NAND, but Toshiba is gaining ground, according to the new third-quarter rankings from iSuppli Corp. The real head scratcher is Intel, which continues to trail in the rankings.
Meanwhile, the overall NAND market is recovering after a bad downturn. ''What a difference a year makes,'' said Joseph Unsworth, an analyst with Gartner, in a report. ''After a disastrous 2008, NAND vendors were in despair. But in 2009 rationalism ensued and industry balance was forced into repair. With demand staying robust through most of 2009, vendors' hopes grew, As supply constraints remain, 2010 looks quite strong, as does 2011, too.''
Prices are better as well. ''NAND contract pricing in early December was down slightly across most densities, but compared with December 2008, prices for MLC parts have roughly doubled, and prices for SLC parts have stayed relatively flat. The current price for a 16Gb MLC part is about $4.68, which compares with $2.25 for the same part a year ago,'' he said.
''Not only does this show the disastrous conditions the NAND vendors faced a year ago, but also the severity of the adjustments that were made to rectify the oversupply problem,'' he said.
''The outlook for the remainder of December is that pricing is likely to remain soft, but given optimism during recent channel checks, it appears that prices will remain stable leading into 2010 before sliding again in the second quarter. The year 2010 will be a strong one for NAND vendors with revenue growth of more than 20 percent,'' he said.




PChem
12/23/2009 12:16 PM EST
It seems odd to me that Samsung's 4Gb array of cells each of which store 3 bits multiplies out to 32Gb. 4Gb x 3 = 12Gb. My understanding is that each cell of a 3 bit/cell memory stores 8 levels but that this is still only equivalent to 3 bits. How can Samsung and other MLC manufacturers get away with what seems to be deceptive labeling?
Sign in to Reply
imesp
12/24/2009 9:24 AM EST
I suspect the difference is related to chip stacking and that multiple 4G chips are stacked to may one final commercial memory module. . . .
Sign in to Reply