News & Analysis
ARM wants every MIPS socket
Junko Yoshida
12/11/2009 12:31 PM EST
![]() |
| Mike Inglis executive vice president, ARM |
PARIS As recently as five years ago, ARM's competitors included a host of IP processor companies such as MIPS, ARC and Tensilica. Now, like it or not, the field of serious processor competition has dramatically narrowed to, well, ARM vs. Intel Corp.
ARM has also substantially expanded its processor core design sockets -- both to high-end and low-end markets. On one hand, the company has bravely marched into the multi-core future, and has relentlessly rolled out a series of Mali graphics processor units and video engines.
On the other hand, ARM this year made a genuinely strong foray into the microcontroller market. ARM took the first step by offering initial seed funding to Luminary Micro. Then earlier this year, Texas Instruments -- by acquiring Luminary Micro -- turned ARM into a household name in the microcontroller market.
Ninety ARM processors are shipped every second -- more than any other 32-bit processor IP supplier, the company's Web site claims.
So far, everything you hear about ARM sounds peachy. You're impressed.
But then, ask yourself: If you were running ARM's processor division, what's your biggest worry right now?
The answer is "plenty."
Not least among ARM's headaches is the serious competition posed by a gargantuan microprocessor company (Intel). You might lose sleep over how best to help your licensees navigate uncharted shoals of multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. You might also be concerned about whether graphics companies like Nvidia, AMD or Imagination will become serious rivals as you move forward with your Mali GPU.
Most of all, you worry that you could be overstretching yourself.
During an interview with EE Times at the ARM European Technical Conference here this week, Mike Inglis, executive vice president and general manager of the processor div. at ARM, said, "As ARM gets deployed in a much broader market, the industry's demand on us has dramatically increased." He said, "I worry if we are moving fast enough."
Inglis is also mindful of critical responsibilities in building software eco-systems, a must for the future growth of ARM. But he also noted, "We need to make sure that we are not duplicating efforts."





Tsantes
12/11/2009 3:03 PM EST
Every MIPS socket?...that shouldn't be hard to do.
Sign in to Reply
Pryderi
12/11/2009 7:47 PM EST
Well, THREE x86 players if you want to count them all; people forget about VIA. But their market share is pretty forgettable.
There are quite a few embedded MIPS processors out there, so taking all those MIPS sockets is not an insignificant goal. The fact that Microchip, one of the big players in the market for 8 and 16-bit embedded processors, went to MIPS for their 32 bit product can't be ignored either.
Sign in to Reply
CharlieCL
12/11/2009 8:04 PM EST
Before showing us a real SoC better than MIPS, this is a hyper-statement.
Sign in to Reply
mikestefoy
12/12/2009 2:40 AM EST
I think Microchip made a big mistake by not going ARM.
maybe that's why they wanted ATMEL so much.
Sign in to Reply
NaliniKumarMuppala
12/12/2009 7:17 AM EST
Intel vs ARM will turn out to be a more exciting battle as current ARM ecosystem partners come under competition with ARM entering new markets (think nVIDIA's dilemma as ARM pushes Mali) and if Intel gets an ecosystem partner or two.
http://deviceconvergence.wordpress.com/
Sign in to Reply
jyoshida
12/14/2009 2:20 AM EST
NaliniKumarMuppala, that's interesting. Do you think that there is a chance that ARM's own ecosystem could be fragmented in the future?
Sign in to Reply
MikeSantarini
12/14/2009 6:17 PM EST
Um, am I missing something here? Did MIPS decline to comment on ARM's assertions in this piece?
Sign in to Reply