News & Analysis
EDA tools for FPGAs running out of gas
Mark LaPedus
12/10/2008 6:21 PM EST
SAN JOSE, Calif. -- The field-programmable gate array (FPGA) market has experienced lackluster and flat growth in recent times. But now, the sector faces a set of new challenges that could threaten the business.
Like most chip makers, FPGA suppliers face the current and steep IC downturn. In one form or another, Actel, Altera, Lattice, Xilinx and others have been impacted by the downturn.
Simon Bloch, vice president and general manager of the Design and Synthesis Division for Mentor Graphics Corp., also said the FPGA business faces four other major challenges: growing design complexity; lower power methodologies; a shortage of IC designers; and the fact that the EDA tools are running out of gas.
''At same point, the tools don't scale anymore,'' Bloch warned. ''You need (new and) disruptive tools in the flow.''
It's unclear if the Mentor executive was taking a pot shot at rivals or the FPGA houses, many of which offer their own design environments. Nonetheless, the problem is that leading-edge FPGAs are scaling to 40-nm and beyond, but the tools have not caught up with these new and complex processes.
Within the FPGA world itself, there is good and bad news. Over the years, FPGA design starts have been ''quite flat,'' Bloch said during a keynote address at the FPGA Summit here on Tuesday.
On the other hand, ''there is good reason for optimism," he said. FPGAs ''are one of the growth segments in the semiconductor industry.''
FPGA houses are attacking the market on several fronts. For example, Altera Inc. recently rolled out a leading-edge 40-nm FPGA. And Actel Corp. has introduced what it claims is the world's lowest-cost FPGA.
The products from various vendors have created some new issues. In the old days, FPGAs were easy to design and program. ''Now, they are getting more complex,'' Bloch said. "The biggest impediment for FGPAs is complexity. We are benefiting from the shrinkage in process technology, but we are paying the price in complexity.''
Besides complexity, there is another problem that could hamper FGPA growth. ''There is a shortage of skilled designers in FPGAs,'' he said.
Even if there were enough designers, the EDA tools are in real need of improvement. ''Traditional design flows are not scaling anymore,'' he said.
The Mentor executive offered some solutions to the EDA problem: IP reuse; low-power design methodologies; and high-level synthesis (HLS).
''Ever increasing design size and complexity have pushed traditional RTL methodologies to their limits. Design requirements and time-to-market pressures are combining to make it impossible for designers to find optimal RTL implementations within their allotted schedule. High-level synthesis reduces manual effort required to produce RTL, and enables designers to avoid syntax errors common in traditional methodologies,'' according to Mentor's Web site.
Next: Bad week for FPGAs




ME95124
12/11/2008 11:36 PM EST
ASIC and FPGA design challenges ultimately result from the combination of space (area) and time. The temporal issues need to be abstracted away at the block level while, simultaneously, the spacial issues move up to the architectural level. Unfortunately, different EDA and ESL companies have the individual pieces. Some company or companies need the courage to realize that their current tools will be replaced by the correctly done, future tools. If they don't get going now, they will ruin (or at least severely diminish) both the ASIC and FPGA markets.
There are existing patents on how to do this and strategic thinkers could stop this decline within 18 months. But, alas, the EDA industry is only worried about hurting their business in the short term.
So, when EDA is almost out of business, will THEY go to congress looking for a bailout because of their short-sighted revenue tactics and lack of vision??
Sign in to Reply