The Cole /bin

Netscape redux: Google's Chrome browser now an OS

Bernard Cole

8/5/2009 4:31 PM EDT

San Francisco, Ca. - The day that Microsoft has dreaded since the mid-1990s is at hand: Google Inc. is rolling out a new browser-based PC OS that stands a good chance of dislodging the software giant's Windows.

And, by the way, also transforming personal computing from a localized desktop activity to a netcentric paradigm in which activity occurs "out there" in the "compute cloud."

It is a reversal of the position that Microsoft was in during the mid 1990s when Netscape burst upon the world with its Web browser software, a commercial version of Mosaic, developed under contract to the U.S. government, and available at the time as a more primitive browser add on, and as a competitor to the Lynx browser, an even more rudimentary text-based browser.

At one point Netscape Communications Corp. held more than 95 percent of the then nascent Web browser market, until Microsoft refocused its attention from a total attention to the desktop environment to a market it had - until that point -totally ignored.

Struggling for several years to compete against Netscape head to head with its own browser, also based on Mosaic, Microsoft bit the bullet and offered its browser free to users of its Windows OS, which still owns a lion's share of the desktop OS market, albeit slightly smaller due to inroads from a variety of open source Linux OS variants.

Netscape's new idea: The Web is the app platform
But what signaled Netscape's doom and made Microsoft shift strategies - offering its browser free and muscling its customers and hardware partners to make it harder for Netscape to compete - was not its struggle to compete with Netscape's dominance in the browser segment - minuscule compared to desktop software.

More threatening was that Netscape had started talking about - and working with partners on - a new Web-browser centric applications programming interface that would bypass the desktop OS as the platform within which all application software would run.

The idea, Netscape proposed, was a totally Web-centric applications environment in which developers would write their software to run under the browser without the intervention of the OS altogether.

If Netscape's idea had caught on, Microsoft's domination of desktop computing would have been ended before the end of the 1990s, and the shift to what everyone is now calling "cloud computing" would have occurred 15 years ago.

Now, Netscape is no more, while its browser still survives as the open source Firefox, which is still nibbling away at Windows Internet Explorer domination on the desktop.

Google's Chrome OS - The Web is STILL the platform
At its core, Google's new desktop, netbook, smartphone OS is built around Google's just introduced Chrome browser and will debut by the second half of 2010.

It will initially be targeted at the low-cost netbook market, although it will eventually migrate to the PC segment, an area long dominated by Microsoft, which is planning to roll out the latest version of its Windows OS later this year.

Its recent fiasco with the Windows Vista, more or less rejected by both business and personal users of the desktop OS, has forced it to come up with a more streamlined, and backwards compatible desktop Window 7 OS (sort of, which will come out later next year, just as Google's Chrome becomes available.

Unlike Windows, Google's Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips, and the company is working with multiple OEMs to bring a number of netbooks to market next year.

The software architecture that Google is proposing is amazingly similar to the original Netscape effort - Google Chrome will run within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel, in essence, making the Web the application platform not the desktop or the desktop OS.

Rethinking the OS, again
Google says it is entering the OS market because the current technology products are outmoded, designed as they were in an era when they was no Web, making it necessary to re-think what operating systems should be.

Compared to Netscape, which was David to Microsoft's Goliath, Google is another Goliath, rivaling in size to Microsoft, having gained its financial heft by initially targeting a segment of the Web market also totally ignored by Microsoft " web search engines, a strategic mistake much more serious than its lack of attention to the browser market in the mid-90s.

Google claims its Chrome browser is already being used by more than 30 million people globally. And it is also going after Microsoft's domination of the applications market by developing products compatible with its rival's Microsoft Office applications, as online applications that do not need a desktop OS to operate.

Google is also challenging Microsoft in another area where Microsoft is still working hard to compete, much less dominate - mobile devices. Against Microsoft's smartphone OS, Google's Android OS for mobile devices is rapidly gaining momentum.

Unlike Netscape's pioneering an ultimately unsuccessful effort to shift applications development and operation from the desktop to the browser and to the web, Microsoft may have more than met its match in Google.

With over $17 billion in cash and short-term investments, Google has more enough funding to support the new OS, and its own domination of the Web search engine market also gives it a strong platform to successfully compete with Microsoft.

A variety of wrong moves and failures by Microsoft may also be playing in to Google's hand. One is the effort by Microsoft initially to downplay the vulnerability of its operating system to viruses. Then there is its effort to take advantage of its perceived domination of the market bully not only PC makers, software competitors and even the end user.

Like I said, Microsoft's worst nightmare.

Embedded.com editor Bernard Cole is ESD Magazine articles editor as well as site leader ofTechrite Associates editorial services consultancy. He welcomes your feedback. Call him at 602-288-7257 or send an email to bccole@acm.org.





GLRepuspolo

8/5/2009 9:45 PM EDT

hello,

First off, thanks for sharing. However I am in the opinion that we have to see this Chrome OS first, before we start believing in it. I mean, does it really pose a significant market-share threat to Microsoft? Is it really better?

Personal / local computing has a lot of advantages too, net-centric or cloud based computing may sound too cool but may be inefficient in a variety of cases.

As for security/viruses, its like the skynet thingy in terminator. You pollute the cloud, everyone says goodbye. So yeah, I think it is better to have a localized incident of a virus, than relying on a cloud breakdown.

As for Windows 7, its release is not next year, it is this year October. Have you tried its release candidate? It is kinda impressive. And I do intend to buy it.

I am not related to MS in anyways. Majority of my jobs, had been in the Open Source front and have some experience on Android. But in my opinion, it might be too early to announce Chrome as a real competitor. :)

But resoundingly, I do agree that it is great that somebody is starting to seriously challenge Microsoft. Thank God so much to Google for that.

In the end,all of us end-consumers win :D

Sign in to Reply



planetxmail

8/6/2009 9:49 PM EDT

This article is SO WAY out there, and what you are talking about is completely illogical. From a technical stand point as well as political.

TECHNICAL

How will GAMES ( direct x ) games be made to run? In a web browser? If not, then not using a web brower isnt much different from the great linux (and apple) platforms we have already. I'll give you the fact Google has BILLIONS and all the years of R and D of Open Source to leverage.

Canvas and the new HTML 5 standards coming out with the increased speeds of Javascript are making FLASH run for it's money (adobe). So, maybe one day a great API to make highly response and rich UI's and games may be possible soon (with in a browser that supports HTML 5)

I do not think you quit comprehend the shure magnitude of the Microsoft API and the whole .NET framework MS has built. It is remarkable that one corporation is able to pull such a deep and powerful Windows API along with Direct X for game APIs. Google, will have to start FRESH with it's APIs... not to mention push them onto the market and provoke Software development companies to use them...

Finally, there is that ONE, just ONE Application that someone HAS to have so they run windows. Programs like PhotoShop, Audition, 3dsMax and on and on... I do not think you fully understand the deepth to how many VITALLY important massively developed programs and corporations built around them, that Microsoft is using as their 'platform'. Converting all these to Google? marketing them? Making people change to a 'new' photoshop? In order for this to happen for google, it would have to deploy a 'NINJA saleforce' (just as MS has now) to go out there and force feed the idea of using a NEW platform...and port it to Google.

POLITICALLY

People like privacy. ESPECIALLY corporations and their 'trade secrets'. Do you honestly think that they will be willing to place them in the 'cloud' on the internet on another companies server??? Having EVERYTHING in the Cloud also means that if your Internet goes down ( a router or such ) an entire business is cut off from it's data??? No.. LOCAL computing is just as important and REMOTE computing... equally so ( in my humble opinion )

Not everyone shares (or is even AWARE) of the pay Microsoft has caused on so many competitors that it is crushed... nor is most the population geeky enough to even be aware Microsoft is a 'bad bad no no' company in the first place!!! Yes. our numbers are growing, but PLEASE.

ENDING

I look FORWARD to Google OS, I use Linux every day, and I try to stray far from Windows as I can... but the truth is... I can't run ALL my programs on Linux ( even with WINE chucking away trying to make it happen for me... )

So, I am not a microsoft fanboy fool. nor am I a Linux and Open Source much crush MS because of it's Criminal (only Business) behavior. I do not agree with it... but then again I don't agree with A LOT of things in America and how capitalism over takes all...such as in medicine.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Featured Job On
Scroll for More Jobs