Break Points

Twenty years on

Jack Ganssle

1/1/2008 12:00 PM EST

Twenty years is a long time in human terms and even longer in the microprocessor industry. Here's a look at what's transpired.

For twenty years, Embedded Systems Design (formerly known as Embedded Systems Programming) has been the only professional journal targeted at the working embedded systems developer. Twenty years is a long time, a generation in human terms, though in the microprocessor industry more like three or four generations. Some of 1988's young engineers are now grandfathers. Processors have come and gone. Once dominant companies no longer exist, new ones formed, and some giant semiconductor companies got completely out of the business.

Twenty years ago, PCs had 80386 processors operating at 33 MHz, a speed pretty well matched to DRAM cycle times. They neither had nor needed cache. Those CPUs, built with the latest 1-micron semiconductor processes, sported a quarter million transistors. That was a hundred times more than in the very first microprocessor, and a thousand times less than in today's high-end parts.

Today, 45 nm devices are in production, which is 20 times more compact than those in 1988. I'm told that gate oxides are now an astonishing six or seven atoms thick. Processor speeds have increased by two orders of magnitude, and on-board caches today hold millions of bytes, which is more memory than most early ESP subscribers had in their entire computer.

The 80386 is no more, Intel's last parts having shipped in 2007. In 1988 that CPU was utterly state-of-the-art; today it's laughably slow. Sic transit gloria.

Although the Macintosh existed and gained lots of attention, it had relatively few sales. Microsoft Windows was in its second version but was unusable. MS-DOS ruled the desktop OS landscape and by 1988 was pretty much the standard development platform for embedded systems programmers, although some workstations and custom development platforms were in use. Most engineers had hard drives with under 100 MB capacity, not even enough for a copy of today's version of Microsoft Word.

Twenty years ago, the embedded industry was merely 17 years old (based on Intel's release of the 4004 in 1971), an acned teenager, undergoing growth pains. Most of us worked in assembly language. Only a few years had gone by since Ed Lee of Prolog fame convinced too many that assemblers were evil and real programmers coded in hex. A lot of devotees drank that poisonous Kool-Aid.

C wasn't common in embedded systems. In fact, the C landscape was a battleground as every vendor implemented its own dialects of the language. Manx C, K&R C, Whitesmith's C--all were subtly different. ANSI C didn't exist, though a committee was hard at work coming up with the standard.

Ada had an ANSI standard, though, and, in 1988 the U.S. Department of Defense had just mandated its use in most new software products it acquired. That requirement was eliminated a decade later. Now Ada's market share has fallen to just a few percent, losing out to C and increasingly C++.

C++ was available; the first edition of The C++ Programming Language had been published in 1985. But there was no standard of any sort, and the language, even in 1988, didn't have multiple inheritance and many other features now codified in the 1998 ANSI standard. Virtually no one used the language in the embedded world.


Next:




Nihil Obstat (Niky)

12/29/2007 11:35 PM EST

Great memories, Jack!
But K&R never wrote a C++ book,
to my knowledge...

Happy new year for all of you.

Sign in to Reply



ESD editorial staff: SRambo

12/31/2007 10:47 AM EST

Nihil Obstat:
THanks for the catch. This was an editing error. I linked to the wrong book and referenced the wrong authors. I've corrected it above by reinstating what Jack originally wrote. Thanks again.

Sign in to Reply



CGates

1/13/2008 5:54 PM EST

Jack,
OMG! I am afraid that I will have to take down my effigy of you along with your shrine that I had built for you…. You have erred in the most egregious way possible.
>>"Nohau, the best provider of 8051 emulators".

Not even close! We used to have a subtitle for Nohau (pronounced "Know How"). It was:
"Nohau... No way!!"

Nohau was the only emulator provider that I have ever heard of that caused another company to produce a replacement front end application for Nohau's horrid emulator application.
Nohau never could figure out that their hardware would "skid" past a breakpoint, so this replacement application would backfill around breakpoints with NOPs and then reset the PC to the breakpoint address and re-fill with the correct code when the breakpoint was encountered.

The day Nohau went away I danced!

BTW just to set history straight the best provider of 8051 emulators was (and still is) Signum Systems. They now provide emulators for a lot of different targets (especially ARM cores), but I started using Signum in a CP/M 8085 based host! (remember the S-100 bus?). Many medical devices where/are in existence due to their excellent ICE. Keep them in mind as the 8051 is NEVER going away! (I am amazed; I just got a new project for a cutting edge device that will use that venerable core!)

Guest, I am ashamed to admit that I used many of the Blue Boxes (Series 3 and 4) from Intel. The only floppy drive I have ever seen that weighted over 80 pounds! The whole system was a boat anchor. As I recall those systems ran about $60K a piece. Compare that with today’s TI’s ez USB development sticks which they give away at shows! No wonder this marketplace is gone!

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Jobs sponsored by

Feedback Form