Design Article

Choosing the Right Frequency for Point-to-Point Radio Connections

Erik Boch, DragonWave

12/17/2003 12:07 PM EST

Choosing the Right Frequency for Point-to-Point Radio Connections
With interest growing around deploying public wireless LANs (PWLANs), designers of wireless equipment are faced with a challenge. Traditionally, wireless infrastructure designs provide a LAN or backhaul mechanism that uses either the unlicensed 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, or 5.8 GHz bands for transporting information between buildings or the central office and a remote site. But, with WLAN networks operating these same bands, new interference problems are beginning to arise in today's wireless networks.

Fortunately, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has opened new unlicensed frequency bands in the 24 GHz and 60 GHz bands that could solve the problem. By using these bands for backhaul and the existing bands for wireless data transfers, designers can solve potential interference headaches. Let's see how.

Point-to-Point and Point to Multipoint: Living in Harmony
PWLAN hotspots and distributed/multi-location LANs may employ wireless technology within the access layer as well as in the inter-LAN-segment and backhaul layers (Figure 1). The primary difference between LANs and hotspot lies in the user traffic and applications involved. Generally, a LANs traffic is concentrated within work groups which are generally serviced by isolated LAN segments whereas within a hotspot, very little of the traffic is peer-to-peer within the LAN...it is mostly destined for the Internet.


Figure 1: Hotspots/LANs employing multi-point and point-to-point radio technologies.

In these scenarios unlicensed operation is attractive in the user access layer simply because of three things

  • The unlicensed nature of the technology
  • The costs of the associated equipment involved (access points and PC NIC cards)
  • The standardized interfaces employed (i.e. IEEE 802.11 a/b/g)

Therefore, the deployment of the network relies on applying the maximum amount of capacity to the access layer users since this is where the revenue is being made (or where the applications are being used in the case of a corporate LAN). This then dictates the desire to apply all available unlicensed RF channels to the access points (APs) within the access layer of the network.

The point-to-point links in the LAN interconnect and backhaul layers are therefore deployed on other frequencies since it is not desirable to consume valuable unlicensed spectrum on these functions. The fixed-outdoor, longer-range nature of these point-to-point links makes them subject to detrimental interference. In contrast to the user access layer, where mobility enables the user to "fix" RF blockage and locational interference problems, the fixed outdoor nature of these point-to-point links makes use of the 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz ranges a poor choice for medium to long term high capacity applications that depends on interference free operation.

Therefore, moving from the very short range, indoor environment—where the user essentially fixes any link problems—to the longer-range outdoor environment—where "fixes" are network-affecting and costly to address—changes the way the service provider tends to think about using unlicensed technologies. There is a notion that interference can be dealt with through coordination, but the fact is that many sources of interference are not coordinatable or are not bothered by it and are therefore not overly motivated to do anything differently.

In the case of hotspot deployments, the user access layer and backhaul layer may be parts of a larger, layered metropolitan network construct. As shown in Figure 2, the lower layers (user access) generally have much lower availability and reliability demands than the higher layers. Interference susceptibility needs to be carefully examined in the context of the whole network. A number of factors may affect deployment solutions, including:

  • Revenue dependencies
  • Number of users impacted by an outage
  • MTTR of any network segment


Figure 2: Typical metropolitan network layering. Hotspots should be included in this layer.

Choices
With the assumption that the 2.4, 5.2, 5.8 GHz bands are optimally deployed/consumed in the user access layers of the network, designers need to understand what the choices are for deploying the point-to-point links that interconnect the LAN segments in various buildings or operate as the backhaul for a hotspot.

Unlicensed broadband wireless offers a quick and easy deployment option without the associated regulatory process or fees associated with licensed frequencies. The downside of the unlicensed frequencies is that other users can become uncontrolled sources of radio interference, which causes all of the interfering systems to degrade in performance and can impact or even destroy a given broadband link. This degraded performance can unpredictably change the transmission performance of the system, including significant changes/reductions in transmission bandwidths. It is important to note that the other "users" of the spectrum may or may not be "coordinatable" entities—you cannot coordinate with a home users handi phone or microwave oven.

Figure 3 conceptually illustrates the major differences between the radio engineering rules allowed for the "broadcast centric" point to multipoint non-line of sight access models typically used in the 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz unlicensed bands compared to the point-to-point, line-of-sight access model intended for the 24 GHz, and 60 GHz unlicensed bands. These differences make 24 GHz and 60 GHz unlicensed bands well suited to high capacity high bandwidth high performance applications (for example direct to enterprise voice and data, traffic aggregation and/or backhaul applications).

Click here for Figure 3

Figure 3: Fundamental differences between broadcast and line-of-sight centric unlicensed bands.

When interference strikes a fixed broadband radio link, it can be permanent or transient in nature. Debugging these types of interference problems requires a high degree of uncommon RF field expertise and this can easily become time consuming and costly to fix. Determining that a problem exists in a fixed wireless link is only the first step. The next step is to determine where the source of interference is coming from. This in itself is a challenge since the location determination process requires two-dimensional angle and range information whilst the debugging activity only really produces the needed angular data.

Focusing on the operation of the point-to-point links in the network, it is then imperative to consider the interference attributes of the available spectral allocations to ensure that the exposure to potential interference is well understood. When applying these technologies to a given network, the relationship between interference, availability and operating frequency shown in Figure 4 is applicable.


Figure 4: Interference susceptibilities of various operating frequencies and how they impact overall network performance.

Spectral Allocations
There are essentially four spectral allocations that are used for broadband point-to-point applications in North America:

  • 2.4, 5.2, 5.8 GHz
  • Licensed operation (i.e. 18 GHz or 23 GHz)
  • 24 GHz
  • 60 GHz
  • 80 GHz/95 GHz

Let's look at each of these in more detail starting with 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz.

  • 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz Bands: As noted earlier, it is highly desirable to consume the 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz spectrum segments in the user access layer where the commoditized, low-cost user devices are available and where the shorter ranges involved mitigate the impact of any interference. Additionally, in larger networks, there is a need to consume all/many available channels in the pursuit of self-coordination within the own-network itself. Use of these allocations for longer range, fixed outdoor links only reduces the capacity in the user access layer. Unlicensed operation brings with it regulated EIRP limitations which reduce operating range. This is offset somewhat by the lower frequency of operation, making links on the order of 10 to 30 km possible from a radio propagation perspective. (Note: In the point-to-point radio case considered, limitations related to interference may significantly reduce useable operating range).

  • Licensed allocations (i.e. 18 GHz or 23 GHz): Licensed spectrum offers the ultimate in interference-free operation. There are numerous license allocations available in virtually all countries globally that are able to support broadband point-to-point connectivity. The downside of licensed spectrum is that government regulation is involved. This brings with it the associated applications, forms and other paper work and of course, fees. Additionally, a key market benefit that the broadband wireless service provider has is deployment speed—particularly where there is no existing fiber. In some cases the delay (albeit usually minor) caused by the licensing process may reduce the attractiveness of the wireless service when compared to its fiber counterpart. Licensed operation also allows the use of higher power transmissions and longer-range operation. 18 GHz links on the order of 30 to 50 km are possible.

  • 24 GHz unlicensed: This allocation is a recent addition to the unlicensed spectrum resource that is available. There are several key features of 24 GHz operation that are attractive for point-to-point applications. The 24 GHz operation allows the use of relatively small antennas (i.e. 1 and 2 foot) which can simultaneously provide very high spatial filtering of hostile interferers. The fact that 24 GHz signals do not readily pass through building materials or foliage enables additional rejection of hostile interferers. The combination of these attributes allows highly robust, dependable operation. Additionally it is readily possible to rely on polarization rejection at sites where interference becomes problematic.

    Being an ISM unlicensed band precludes the use of the spectrum for any use other than the select, small group identified by the FCC. In the communications area, only Point-to-Point transmissions are allowed in the 24 GHz band. Therefore, this reduces the chances of interference.

    Licensing in the US forces relatively low power transmitters to be used in the 24 GHz band, thereby limiting operating ranges to typically less than 3 to 6 miles. However, the lower power functionality also tends to facilitate lower cost products.

    Generally, since interference in the 24 GHz band is not a significant problem, inefficient transmission protocols (such as 802.11b) do not need to be deployed in this frequency range. Alternately, high efficiency, broadband solutions are normally deployed which provide data rates at 100 to 200 Mbit/s or higher. Transmission power limitations associated with unlicensed operation limit the useful range of these systems to approximately 10 km or less, depending upon the desired availability.

  • 60 GHz unlicensed: Operation at 60 GHz exploits natural atmospheric absorption phenomenon. This propagation factor therefore essentially naturally suppresses signals from hostile interference sources giving this band an attractive mixture of unlicensed deployment and near-interference-free operation. The atmospheric absorption present in and around 60 GHz also adversely affects the propagation of the desired signals. Generally, this results in broadband wireless links of a kilometer or less.

    One major benefit of 60 GHz is that interference is even less of an issue than in the 24 GHz band. Therefore this opens the possibility of deploying in broadband (100 to 1000 Mbit/s), reliability-sensitive implementations.

  • 80 and 95 GHz unlicensed: This band is a new allocation in which better propagation is available than at 60 GHz. The regulations do not require that a coordination study be undertaken, but they do require the link to be registered and licensed, reducing the time to get a license. The registration provides the basis for a "first-come-first-protected" policy in the event of interference.

    Wrap Up
    The explosive growth in hot spot applications is accompanied by high bandwidth LAN segment interconnect and backhaul demands of which a portion are well suited for wireless point-to-point technology. The choice of operating frequencies for the various layers of these networks optimally allocates the lower frequency in the access layer. This then demands another operating frequency for the point-to-point links. Ideal choices for these links are 24 GHz and 60 GHz. These new unlicensed bands offer high bandwidth potential and are less potential for harmful interference from other sources.

    About the Author
    Erik Boch is the CTO and vice president of engineering at DragonWave. He has an MSEE and can be reached at eboch@dragonwaveinc.com.





  • Please sign in to post comment

    Navigate to related information

    Datasheets.com Parts Search

    185 million searchable parts
    (please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

    Feedback Form