Design Article
Choosing the Right Frequency for Point-to-Point Radio Connections
Erik Boch, DragonWave
12/17/2003 12:07 PM EST
With interest growing around deploying public wireless LANs (PWLANs), designers of wireless equipment are faced with a challenge. Traditionally, wireless infrastructure designs provide a LAN or backhaul mechanism that uses either the unlicensed 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, or 5.8 GHz bands for transporting information between buildings or the central office and a remote site. But, with WLAN networks operating these same bands, new interference problems are beginning to arise in today's wireless networks.
Fortunately, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has opened new unlicensed frequency bands in the 24 GHz and 60 GHz bands that could solve the problem. By using these bands for backhaul and the existing bands for wireless data transfers, designers can solve potential interference headaches. Let's see how.
Point-to-Point and Point to Multipoint: Living in Harmony
PWLAN hotspots and distributed/multi-location LANs may employ wireless technology within the access layer as well as in the inter-LAN-segment and backhaul layers (Figure 1). The primary difference between LANs and hotspot lies in the user traffic and applications involved. Generally, a LANs traffic is concentrated within work groups which are generally serviced by isolated LAN segments whereas within a hotspot, very little of the traffic is peer-to-peer within the LAN...it is mostly destined for the Internet.

In these scenarios unlicensed operation is attractive in the user access layer simply because of three things
- The unlicensed nature of the technology
- The costs of the associated equipment involved (access points and PC NIC cards)
- The standardized interfaces employed (i.e. IEEE 802.11 a/b/g)
Therefore, the deployment of the network relies on applying the maximum amount of capacity to the access layer users since this is where the revenue is being made (or where the applications are being used in the case of a corporate LAN). This then dictates the desire to apply all available unlicensed RF channels to the access points (APs) within the access layer of the network.
The point-to-point links in the LAN interconnect and backhaul layers are therefore deployed on other frequencies since it is not desirable to consume valuable unlicensed spectrum on these functions. The fixed-outdoor, longer-range nature of these point-to-point links makes them subject to detrimental interference. In contrast to the user access layer, where mobility enables the user to "fix" RF blockage and locational interference problems, the fixed outdoor nature of these point-to-point links makes use of the 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz ranges a poor choice for medium to long term high capacity applications that depends on interference free operation.
Therefore, moving from the very short range, indoor environmentwhere the user essentially fixes any link problemsto the longer-range outdoor environmentwhere "fixes" are network-affecting and costly to addresschanges the way the service provider tends to think about using unlicensed technologies. There is a notion that interference can be dealt with through coordination, but the fact is that many sources of interference are not coordinatable or are not bothered by it and are therefore not overly motivated to do anything differently.
In the case of hotspot deployments, the user access layer and backhaul layer may be parts of a larger, layered metropolitan network construct. As shown in Figure 2, the lower layers (user access) generally have much lower availability and reliability demands than the higher layers. Interference susceptibility needs to be carefully examined in the context of the whole network. A number of factors may affect deployment solutions, including:
- Revenue dependencies
- Number of users impacted by an outage
- MTTR of any network segment

Choices
With the assumption that the 2.4, 5.2, 5.8 GHz bands are optimally deployed/consumed in the user access layers of the network, designers need to understand what the choices are for deploying the point-to-point links that interconnect the LAN segments in various buildings or operate as the backhaul for a hotspot.
Unlicensed broadband wireless offers a quick and easy deployment option without the associated regulatory process or fees associated with licensed frequencies. The downside of the unlicensed frequencies is that other users can become uncontrolled sources of radio interference, which causes all of the interfering systems to degrade in performance and can impact or even destroy a given broadband link. This degraded performance can unpredictably change the transmission performance of the system, including significant changes/reductions in transmission bandwidths. It is important to note that the other "users" of the spectrum may or may not be "coordinatable" entitiesyou cannot coordinate with a home users handi phone or microwave oven.
Figure 3 conceptually illustrates the major differences between the radio engineering rules allowed for the "broadcast centric" point to multipoint non-line of sight access models typically used in the 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz unlicensed bands compared to the point-to-point, line-of-sight access model intended for the 24 GHz, and 60 GHz unlicensed bands. These differences make 24 GHz and 60 GHz unlicensed bands well suited to high capacity high bandwidth high performance applications (for example direct to enterprise voice and data, traffic aggregation and/or backhaul applications).
When interference strikes a fixed broadband radio link, it can be permanent or transient in nature. Debugging these types of interference problems requires a high degree of uncommon RF field expertise and this can easily become time consuming and costly to fix. Determining that a problem exists in a fixed wireless link is only the first step. The next step is to determine where the source of interference is coming from. This in itself is a challenge since the location determination process requires two-dimensional angle and range information whilst the debugging activity only really produces the needed angular data.
Focusing on the operation of the point-to-point links in the network, it is then imperative to consider the interference attributes of the available spectral allocations to ensure that the exposure to potential interference is well understood. When applying these technologies to a given network, the relationship between interference, availability and operating frequency shown in Figure 4 is applicable.

Spectral Allocations
There are essentially four spectral allocations that are used for broadband point-to-point applications in North America:
- 2.4, 5.2, 5.8 GHz
- Licensed operation (i.e. 18 GHz or 23 GHz)
- 24 GHz
- 60 GHz
- 80 GHz/95 GHz
Let's look at each of these in more detail starting with 2.4, 5.2, and 5.8 GHz.
Being an ISM unlicensed band precludes the use of the spectrum for any use other than the select, small group identified by the FCC. In the communications area, only Point-to-Point transmissions are allowed in the 24 GHz band. Therefore, this reduces the chances of interference.
Licensing in the US forces relatively low power transmitters to be used in the 24 GHz band, thereby limiting operating ranges to typically less than 3 to 6 miles. However, the lower power functionality also tends to facilitate lower cost products.
Generally, since interference in the 24 GHz band is not a significant problem, inefficient transmission protocols (such as 802.11b) do not need to be deployed in this frequency range. Alternately, high efficiency, broadband solutions are normally deployed which provide data rates at 100 to 200 Mbit/s or higher. Transmission power limitations associated with unlicensed operation limit the useful range of these systems to approximately 10 km or less, depending upon the desired availability.
One major benefit of 60 GHz is that interference is even less of an issue than in the 24 GHz band. Therefore this opens the possibility of deploying in broadband (100 to 1000 Mbit/s), reliability-sensitive implementations.
Wrap Up
The explosive growth in hot spot applications is accompanied by high bandwidth LAN segment interconnect and backhaul demands of which a portion are well suited for wireless point-to-point technology. The choice of operating frequencies for the various layers of these networks optimally allocates the lower frequency in the access layer. This then demands another operating frequency for the point-to-point links. Ideal choices for these links are 24 GHz and 60 GHz. These new unlicensed bands offer high bandwidth potential and are less potential for harmful interference from other sources.
About the Author
Erik Boch is the CTO and vice president of engineering at DragonWave. He has an MSEE and can be reached at eboch@dragonwaveinc.com.



