Design Article

Maintain USB signal integrity when adding ESD protection

Edwin Romero, ON Semiconductor

10/21/2008 5:23 PM EDT

The Universal Serial Bus (USB) is a popular feature of cell phones, MP3 players and other electronic products. USB makes data transfer between electronic devices faster and easier, especially for products using USB 2.0. USB 2.0 transfers data at up to 480 Mbps, a high data rate that is becoming increasingly important as typical file sizes continue to increase. At these data rates any added capacitance to data lines can distort signal shapes and cause interrupts and/or failures in the digital data transmission, placing increased demands on ESD protection devices used on USB 2.0 interfaces. ESD protection devices must be transparent to the signal during normal data transmission while providing immunity from damage or upset during system level ESD compliance testing or real world ESD events in the field. Designers are now challenged to find ESD protection solutions that will protect sensitive lines without adding signal degrading capacitance.

Eye Diagrams
The effect of added capacitance on bandwidth and signal quality can be evaluated using eye diagrams, also known as eye patterns. Eye diagrams are representations of digital signals that provide minimum and maximum voltage levels as well as signal jitter. Eye diagrams expose issues in USB data transmission integrity.

An eye diagram is produced by repetitively sampling a digital signal on an oscilloscope's vertical axis, while triggering the horizontal time sweep with the data rate. The resulting pattern looks like an eye, as shown in Figure 1. The larger the eye the better the data signal integrity. Acceptable signal qualities are often defined with the use of a mask that consists of a hexagon in the middle of the eye and rectangles above and below the eye. If the measured traces cross the mask boundaries the signal quality is considered unacceptable. USB 2.0 signal mask specifications are provided by the USB Implementers Forum (USB Specification Rev. 2.0, Section 7.1.2.2). Figure 1 displays an eye diagram with details of critical points.


Figure 1. USB 2.0 Eye Diagram


Evaluation
Using a USB 2.0 signal at 480Mbps, eye diagrams of three different protection devices with different ranges of capacitance were measured and compared with the USB 2.0 mask. A board without a device was also evaluated for comparison and reference. Comparing the eye diagrams for different protection devices with the diagram for no protection device demonstrates the extent of signal degradation caused by the protection device. It should be noted that this article only takes into account the capacitance of the ESD protection diode and its effect on the USB2.0 high speed signal. In a practical design there would also be capacitance added by other components on the line or by the board itself.


Figure 2. Test without Device

Figure 2 illustrates the test signal without a protection device. This represents a pure USB2.0 high speed signal with no degradation since there is no capacitance added to the line.

In comparison, Figure 3 illustrates an eye diagram of the USB2.0 high-speed signal with a 0.5pF capacitance ESD device added. The eye diagram reveals no major changes or differences in the signal. The 0.5pF ESD device has negligible adverse effect to the integrity of the data signal since the capacitance value is so low. This gives a designer an ESD protection option that will offer maximum flexibility with the capacitance budget to add other components.


Figure 3. 0.5pf ESD Device


Next:


Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

Feedback Form