Design Article
Use a "Linkwitz circuit" to equalize a closed-box audio loudspeaker
Leo Sahlsten, Maxim Integrated Products Inc., Finland
5/6/2008 9:56 PM EDT
Many such circuits are available, but the most popular today is the so-called Linkwitz equalizer (Reference 1) intended for complex-pole systems in which Q > 0.5. The circuit neutralizes the original response by compensating the original poles with zeros, and then creates a new high-pass response as specified by the designer. Like the original, the new circuit provides a 2nd-order response.
Figure 1 shows the basic circuit for one channel (two are required for stereo).

Figure 1: This "Linkwitz transform circuit" lets you neutralize the original response of a bass circuit, and substitute new complex poles that improve the bass response.
(Click on image to enlarge)
The circuit must be driven by a low-impedance source, so you should provide a buffer stage in front of it. Because the circuit of Figure 1 inverts the signal, this buffer should be an inverting type to maintain the original signal phase.
Following is the design procedure suggested by Mr. Linkwitz:
First, specify fo, Qo, fp, and Qp: Fo and Qo are determined from the frequency response of the original, unequalized system. Fo is the -3 dB frequency, and Qo is the system Q. Figure 2 helps to determine the Qo value.

Figure 2: The amplitude response in Figure 1 varies with the system Q as shown.
(Click on image to enlarge)
Fo and Qo specify the exact compensation for existing poles, and are determined by the existing closed-box design. Fp and Qp are target specifications for the transformed system. As an aid in finding the correct values for fp and Qp, Figure 2 shows the response for various Qo values.
Next, calculate the constant "k," which should be positive to ensure realizable equations modeling this circuit topology:
Choose C2. A good start is 470 nF, which gives a reasonably low impedance level with low noise.
Calculate R1:
Calculate R2:
Calculate C1:
Calculate C3:
Calculate R3:
If the calculated resistor values are too large (much over 100 kΩ, for instance), you should increase the value of capacitor C2 and then re-calculate the other component values.
The frequency ratio f0/fc sets the dc gain and low-frequency boost for the circuit. It is recommended that boost not exceed 20 dB, because the increase in power and cone excursion at that level becomes extreme. (For most music, on the other hand, the energy level for signals below 40 Hz is relatively low.)
Because the op amp selected in Figure 1 must handle the entire audio band, it should have low noise, high slew rate, and low distortion. Op amps such as the MAX4478 and MAX4495 are suitable for low-voltage, single-supply designs. For higher supply voltages, consider the dual MAX412 (to provide a buffer on each channel, you will need two of these). Or, you can use a single quad op amp such as the MAX4478 or MAX4495.
Circuit example
To illustrate the procedure we equalize an existing closed box, which transforms the existing fo = 80 Hz and Qo = 1.2 to fp = 30 Hz and Qp = 0.707 (a Butterworth response). Going through the calculations above gives the following component values, rounded to the closest standard values: R1 = 10 kΩ, R2 = 15 kΩ, R3 = 75 kΩ, C1 = 0.82 μF, and C3 = 0.12 μF.
Figure 3 shows the original response, the equalizer response, and the desired combination of those two, which nicely matches the target.

Figure 3: These curves illustrate how the equalizer improves an existing system.
(Click on image to enlarge)
Figure 4 shows the time delay before and after equalization. Although peak delay is higher in the equalized system, the delay over those frequencies that are important for music is improved.

Figure 4: For most music, the equalized system also provides a more favorable delay time.
(Click on image to enlarge)
Reference
1. S. H. Linkwitz, "Loudspeaker system design," Wireless World, December 1978, p. 80.
(Editor's note: If you are interested in more on the Linkwitz circuit, Google the phrase to see many interesting articles and other implementations.)
About the author
Leo Sahlsten, Senior Field Applications Engineer, joined Maxim Integrated Products in 2000. Before joining Maxim, he worked for Nokia Networks in Finland. He studied electronic engineering at the Helsinki Technical College, and has a B Sc degree in electronics engineering.







The Speaker Guy
5/14/2008 11:49 PM EDT
Perhaps I do not understand - you take an existing article, change the op amp part number to one from your company, then publish? Also, a 5V single supply op amp, but the + input is connected to ground in figure 1. Plus and minus 2.5V power supplies are rare. And then, how do you keep dynamic range? You have over 12dB of bass boost, meaning your nominal 1kHz signal is around 400mV RMS as its peak level. Lastly, your graphs seem to be from Excel, not an audio precision. Have you even built this circuit?
Sign in to Reply
MexWex
5/16/2008 5:01 PM EDT
The article recommends starting C2 at 470nF; but the example results are consistent with C2=47nF, a value which is not mentioned anywhere.
Sign in to Reply